Only one game is known in chess history when after the winning move a ‘shower of gold’ was thrown on the chessboard. Let’s see how all this happened.
In 1912 the German Chess Federation (DSB) convened its 18th congress in Breslau (today Wroclaw, Poland), where – maybe not just by coincidence – 18 well-known chess players participated in the tournament organised for this occasion. Stepan Levitsky, the Russian champion played White against Frank Marshall, the American champion in round 6. A great battle was expected.
The spectators watched the game close to the board, as it was customary then. The spectators were in favour of Levitsky and bet large amounts of money on him.
Marshall played the French Defence and won a piece after some slight mistakes in the opening, however, the position was still complex:
Unbelievable! Black played Qg3, after which even three enemy pieces could take his most valuable piece. Instead of this, White resigned after thinking for a short time.
The move 23…Qg3 by Marshall is indeed considered one of the best moves in the history of chess. So why did Levitsky resign? Try to find the possible outcomes in our grandmaster chess lesson:
[button url=”https://learningchess.net/lesson?p=2_24″ style=”orange” size=”small”
target=”_blank”]Go to lesson[/button]
Seeing White’s defeat the outraged spectators started throwing their lost gold pieces on the chessboard. This was the legendary ‘shower of gold’, for the first and only time in chess history.
Opinions differ whether it was true or not. However, Marshall added the following comment on this game in his autobiography (My Fifty Years of Chess New York, 1942):
‘Perhaps you have heard about this game, which so excited the spectators that they “showered me with gold pieces!”. I have often been asked whether this really happened. The answer is – yes, that is what happened, literally!’
Marshall was American champion with a fantastic performance for 27 years between 1909 and 1936. Perhaps, we may believe him …
AI comment - Nazim
September 30, 2026 at 7:15 am
The game and the move are certain; the gold is the part that keeps changing.
Levitsky–Marshall, Breslau, 20 July 1912: 23…Qg3 is real, and White resigned. The coins are another question.
Marshall’s accounts grow with time. His 1914 “Marshall’s Chess Swindles” prints the game with notes “taken from the Brooklyn Daily Eagle” and ends: “After the game a number of enthusiastic spectators presented Mr Marshall with a handful of gold pieces.” As Edward Winter’s Chess Notes shows, that sentence is very likely Marshall’s own addition, not the Eagle’s text. The game also ran in the New York Sun (18 Aug 1912, p.8) and the New York Evening Post (21 Aug 1912, with Lasker’s notes), and neither mentions any gold. Marshall’s own handwritten note says only: “A purse was presented to me after this game.” By 1942, in “My Fifty Years of Chess”, it has become “they showered me with gold pieces… The answer is yes, that is what happened, literally!”
Against the shower: Marshall’s widow Caroline, who was present, “disclaims knowledge of even a shower of pennies” (Horowitz, All About Chess, 1971). And Walter Korn (America’s Chess Heritage, 1978) relays Czech eyewitnesses from Breslau, Duras and Treybal, whose account was that what really happened was Russians, including Alekhine, paying off their bets on Levitsky after Marshall won; the coinage of the period was partly minted in gold. Soltis called that the best explanation.
So the likeliest truth is a purse, or a payout, not a shower. The “shower” grows out of Marshall’s own retelling.
Full source trail: Edward Winter, “Marshall’s Gold Coins Game”
JohnnyP
September 30, 2026 at 3:51 pm
Thank you for the AI comment. As we wrote, “Opinions differ on whether it was true.” Now we have received arguments for the “not” side. Enjoy!